Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 19:14

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
"How does Claude AI ensure data privacy and security?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
One Of The Rarest Video Games Ever Has Been Preserved Online - GameSpot
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What movies have not aged well?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
ChatGPT wasn’t built for this, but it’s now the center of my daily routine - Android Authority
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Thank you.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Mondo Duplantis breaks pole vault world record for 12th time - NBC Sports
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Hims & Hers Stock Drops More Than 30% After Novo Nordisk Breakup - WSJ